The Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Paroline v. Unknown Amy, a case Regarding Restitution for Child Pornography Victims

Professor Cassell, along with lawyer James Marsh, have pursued many in this illegal marketplace on Amy’s behalf, and she has obtained between $1 million and $2 million so far. For them, the enemy is the market itself, and so it makes little sense to apportion damages differently according to the role that was played by a given market participant, or to burden the victim with having to prove how this perpetrator registered this harm.


No Replies to "The Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Paroline v. Unknown Amy, a case Regarding Restitution for Child Pornography Victims"


    Got something to say?

    Some html is OK