Supreme Court considers who should pay damages to child-porn victim

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether the Crime Victims’ Rights Act of 2004 should allow Amy, now in her mid-20s, to collect from Paroline $3.4 million in damages – the amount she estimates she needs to compensate for the psychological injuries that arose from her abuse.


No Replies to "Supreme Court considers who should pay damages to child-porn victim"


    Got something to say?

    Some html is OK