Argument recap: Sorting out the blame

SCOTUS Blog

The Supreme Court left no doubt on Wednesday that it is willing to do its part to make sure that victims of child pornography get paid money to offset the harm done to them. But it also found itself very much in doubt about just what that part would be. The answer in the case of Paroline v. United States may depend upon how the Court understands two words: "apportion" and "contribution."

Find more information online here.

Filed Under  Child Pornography  News  Paroline  Restitution 

No Replies to "Argument recap: Sorting out the blame"


    Got something to say?

    Some html is OK