A federal judge ruled that Paroline was not liable for Amy’s restitution because there was no proof he contributed to her abuse, but a federal appeals court judge decided the opposite way and ordered Paroline to pay $3.4 million.
Helping survivors rebuild their lives with dignity and respect.
· In: Child Pornography, News, Paroline, Restitution
A federal judge ruled that Paroline was not liable for Amy’s restitution because there was no proof he contributed to her abuse, but a federal appeals court judge decided the opposite way and ordered Paroline to pay $3.4 million.
Attorney Advertising | Privacy Policy & Terms of Service | Client's Rights | Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome | Copyright © 2025 Marsh Law Firm
Leave a Reply