The Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Paroline v. Unknown Amy, a case Regarding Restitution for Child Pornography Victims

Justia: Verdict

Professor Cassell, along with lawyer James Marsh, have pursued many in this illegal marketplace on Amy's behalf, and she has obtained between $1 million and $2 million so far. For them, the enemy is the market itself, and so it makes little sense to apportion damages differently according to the role that was played by a given market participant, or to burden the victim with having to prove how this perpetrator registered this harm.

Find more information online here.

Filed Under Child Pornography News Paroline Restitution 

No Replies to "The Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Paroline v. Unknown Amy, a case Regarding Restitution for Child Pornography Victims"


    Leave a Reply